Tim Cook’s explanations did not seem to have convinced the judge

Last weekend, as Epic Games’ lawsuit against Apple was nearing an end, key Cupertino executives were summoned to the bar. distance The sudden intervention of Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering, it was Tim Cook’s turn to appear before a judge.

Three weeks after Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said, Apple CEO Tim Cook was summoned to the bar last Friday. Like Craig Federighi, Tim Cook’s goal was to use the security of the Apple ecosystem as an argument against the accusations of Epic Games.

Tim Cook is in bad shape

Tim Cook said, in addition to exposing scientifically incomprehensible accounts: “From our point of view, secrecy is one of the most important issues of the century, and safety and security are the foundations of secrecy.” The latter adds that the technology has an unfortunate tendency to absorb a lot of data from its users, and according to Tim Cook, Apple should provide devices capable of circumventing this.

Following Apple CEO’s remarks, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers asked a series of questions that might suggest, without revealing her final opinion, that she needs further clarification regarding Tim’s words. Cook.

In any case, despite Apple’s efforts to demonstrate its massive investment in facilitating developers’ work, including implementing APIs like Metal or CoreML, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers remains in doubt. She is particularly interested in small in-game transactions, a practice that does not seem to satisfy her since Apple receives a commission for each of these transactions.

On Monday, May 24, 2021, it was time to debrief these three long weeks of trial. We are now waiting for the final verdict.

READ  We've tested Apple Fitness +, the gym 2.0 we can't wait to see the ground in France

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *