The documents on file did not specify who referred the case to the Bar Complaint Commission, but according to The New York Times, Will be
tens Senior New York Attorney.
The person who led New York City from 1994 to 2001, now 77, was at the center of Donald Trump’s battle to try to invalidate the results of the November 3, 2020 presidential election, which named Joe Biden the winner. However, he has never provided any concrete evidence for this.
He pleaded, unsuccessfully, to several courts in major states to obtain the ballot’s annulment.
The committee noted that the attorney had notably suggested before a Pennsylvania court that the election was the subject of fraud, while he had only brought a case before this court on technical issues.
He was also accused of claiming that thousands of postings related to deceased persons were recorded in Pennsylvania: this claim was never substantiated.
The Committee also notes the accusations made by Mr. Giuliani regarding elections in Georgia and Arizona.
We can only insist on the seriousness of the flaws Rudy Giuliani, the court wrote in its ruling on Thursday.
This country has been riven by attacks targeting the legitimacy of the 2020 election and our current president, Joseph Biden.The five judges who composed it continued.
False statements aim to undermine confidence in our elections and in the government in general, indicates the decision. When they are made by a lawyer, they
Discredit the entire profession المهنة.
The court also cited the events of January 6, in which rioters, mostly supporters of Donald Trump, invaded the Capitol in Washington. According to the judges, they appear
How harmful it can be when the public is deceived by false information about elections.
“Evil thinker. Music scholar. Hipster-friendly communicator. Bacon geek. Amateur internet enthusiast. Introvert.”