Outcry in the United States after spying on Democrats elected under Trump | World | News | The sun

LDemocrats Adam Schiff and Eric Schwall reportedly demanded that Apple release some of their data from the judiciary in 2017 and 2018 as part of an investigation into the leak.

Members of the House of Representatives’ investigative team were both suspected of having been in contact with the media about the most important investigation into suspicions of an alliance between Moscow and Donald Trump’s entourage, which at the outset of the period poisoned all of the Republican president.

In the United States, leaking confidential information is illegal and federal prosecutors can issue search warrants to find the source, but to date, it appears that lawmakers have never targeted this.

Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer summoned former justice ministers Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr to explain themselves to the upper house’s judiciary, saying “this is an abuse of power and an attack on the separation of powers.”

The Inspector General of the Judiciary, for his part, announced an inquiry into “the use of summons and other legal means to obtain communication information from members of Congress, their relatives and the media.”

“A stick”

The case is even more heated because prosecutors have targeted two collaborators and family members, including a minor, to verify that they did not borrow phones to contact journalists.

The information sent did not eventually confirm their suspicions, but the investigation was reopened a year later and did not end until the end of Donald Trump’s presidency, when he invariably accused one of his fiercest opponents, Adam Schiff, of being the author of the leaks. .

See also  I look back on an effort year for leading workers

In addition, the judiciary had issued a notification order on Apple that expired this year, and MPs were unaware of the inquiries until the IT panel informed them last month.

“I would not be surprised to know that this has happened to others,” Eric Schwall commented, denouncing the “unacceptable” facts.

Donald Trump “tried to use the ministry as a stick against his political opponents and members of the media” because Adam Schiff reflected his role.

The New York Times, The Washington Post CNN recently revealed that some of their reporters in the judiciary, who have been insidiously fighting to get their emails and phone call reports under Donald Trump, are also in trouble.

“Limits to secrecy”

Democrat Senator Ron Wyden commented that the lawsuit “proves that the supervisory powers of the Department of Justice can be abused and that limits should be placed on secrecy, which prevents spies from knowing”, “wants to introduce a bill to strengthen transparency” in this area.

“This is what happens when important and secret spy forces are left to the discretion of the executive: they are inevitably abused for political purposes,” said Patrick Doomi, of the powerful civil rights organization ACLU. “Our laws must prevent that.”

Republican and Democratic governments have all tried to find evidence against journalists in the past. After a scandal in 2013, the Barack Obama administration created new rules and imposed a green light from senior judicial officials, without abandoning any decree practice against journalists.

Last week, Joe Biden’s government made a commitment. White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki explained: “It is not in the president’s political will to invite journalists to inquire into political leaks.”

See also  United Kingdom: Release of the fourth edition of VApril

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *