Jeff Bezos Corporation | Blue Origin’s complaint against NASA’s choice of SpaceX

(Washington) Space company Blue Origin filed a lawsuit on Monday to protest NASA’s decision to choose SpaceX to build a lunar lander that will land the next American astronauts on the moon.


France Media

In a statement sent to Agence France-Presse, billionaire company Jeff Bezos condemned that “NASA made a wrong purchase of the” Lunar Ship Program “and changed the rules of the game at the last minute.

This decision eliminates the possibility of competition […] And not only delay, but also endanger America’s return to the moon, ”at the time announced for 2024, the company continues.“ Therefore, we have filed a complaint ”with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an agency of the US Congress.

The US Space Agency announced just over a week ago that it had chosen to return billionaire Elon Musk’s company to the moon, and the Starship missile is still in development. $ 2.9 billion contract.

SPACEX PHOTO via ARCHIVES France Press

The SpaceX Starship rocket takes off during a test in Brownsville, Texas, March 3, 2021.

According to Blue Origin, NASA miscalculated the risks arising from choosing a SpaceX solution, “for an entirely new vehicle,” which “is known to be difficult to develop,” confirms the complaint, a copy of which was reviewed by AFP. Prototypes of this missile are currently being tested in Texas, but the most recent tests have yielded impressive explosions.

In addition, the US space agency’s choice to award only one winner and not winners, contrary to what was emphasized “during the bidding process,” is a “significant risk,” as it deprives it of a “backup plan,” says Blue Origin.

See also  Car theft: watch out for the Apple AirTag

This decision also creates a “potential monopoly on all future exploration missions,” she continues.

Blue Origin, which has partnered with three big names in the aviation industry to respond to NASA’s call to bid (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Draper), regrets that the US agency “has made price (cost to government) the most important factor” due to “perceived” cuts in budgets. .

The company claims that it canceled its decision, and that it is “soliciting new offers” by clarifying “available funds”.

In response to a question by AFP, NASA did not comment but confirmed that it had been notified of the complaint on Monday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.