Cheetahs back into the wild in India after 70 years

SAN FRANCISCO: “Sorry, someone with a smile and a hat and mustache for killing most of humanity,” says an artificial intelligence (AI)-equipped screen to a visitor who walks through the door of the “Museum of Disruption,” a new exhibit about this controversial technology in San Francisco.

Both disturbing and humorous—features common to the majority of the works on display—the computer is programmed to identify and announce three characteristics about each individual who enters its field of vision.

“The idea is that we’re in a post-apocalyptic world where AGM wiped out most of humanity. Then it realized it was a mistake and created a kind of memorial to them,” Audrey explains with a laugh. exhibition.

So-called “general” artificial intelligence is a murkier concept than artificial intelligence.

“It is an artificial intelligence that is able to do everything that humans can do, and also act on itself (…) like an object capable of repairing itself for example,” the curator suggests.

San Francisco and nearby Silicon Valley are teeming with startups designing different types of artificial intelligence. Some dream of one day being able to collaborate with a machine almost as well as with a human.

Realistic or not, this ambition and these efforts have a powerful “destructive potential,” as Audrey Kim asserts.

Through her temporary exhibition, which she hopes to make permanent, she wants to encourage reflection on current and future risks associated with artificial intelligence.

to improve

In the middle of the room is a revised version of Michelangelo’s famous painting, The Creation of Adam, in which an illusory AI detects a foot with 98% certainty, a person (84%) and God (60%).

See also  Charles replaced him. The Queen is absent from the throne speech.

Furthermore, the piano plays music composed by real AI without humans, based on the growth of bacteria grown in a lab.

Audrey Kim is particularly fond of a statue called “Paperclip Embrace” or “Etreinte en trombones”: two busts of humans holding each other in their arms, made entirely of paper clips.

The work refers to a metaphor for philosopher Nick Bostrom, who in the 2000s imagined what might happen if a real AI were programmed to create paper clips.

“It can become more powerful, constantly improving itself to achieve its sole purpose, to the point of destroying all of humanity in order to flood the world with paper clips,” says the director.

She’s been interested in the implications of artificial intelligence and “machine learning” since she worked a few years ago at Cruise, a company that specializes in self-driving cars.

It’s an “incredible” technology that can “reduce the number of accidents caused by human error,” but it also has risks, she says.

Innovations in artificial intelligence seem to be picking up pace in the past year with the boom of software capable of creating all kinds of text and images, instantly, based on user queries.

Their ability to express themselves like humans is so deceptive that a Google engineer, who was later dismissed, said last spring that AI was now “sentient.”


In the near future, generative AI worries both teachers (in the face of articles written using ChatGPT), artists (whose works are used to train certain models) and many other professions.

Associations have also fought for years against invasions of privacy (through facial recognition) and algorithmic biases that reproduce existing discrimination (in recruitment software, for example).

See also  Xavier Dupont de Ligonnès: Witnesses say they saw the fugitive after a documentary aired on Netflix

Sam Altman, founder of OpenAI, the startup behind the GPT-3 model and ChatGPT, defines AI as “AI systems in general will be smarter than humans.”

His coming seems inevitable, and he believes that, if well orchestrated, he will “uplift mankind.”

In the gallery’s basement, Dystopia Hall, a machine powered by GPT-3 composes calligraphic lines of vengeance against humanity, in cursive writing.

Besides, philosopher Slavoj Žižek and director Werner Herzog talk endlessly through ultra-realistic AI-generated dialogue and voices.

This work warns against “deepfakes”, those montages of images, audio or video intended to manipulate public opinion.

“We only started this project five months ago, however, so many of the technologies shown here seem almost primitive,” notes Audrey Kim, as robotic vacuums criss-cross the room, topped with old brooms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *