A new informant accuses Facebook of all evil

New whistleblowers accuse Facebook of putting profits before moderating problematic content Washington PostAs the social media giant struggles to extricate itself from the scandal caused by the discoveries of its former engineer, Francis Haugen.

• Read also: Donald Trump’s futuristic social network is on fire on Wall Street

• Read also: Facebook is in the process of changing its name and brand image

• Read also: Donald Trump announces the launch of his social network

According to an article in a US daily published on Friday, this second whistleblower is also a former Facebook team member responsible for the platform’s civil integrity who made a statement to the SEC, the stock exchange body.

In this document, a former employee of the group recounts private comments made in 2017, when the company was deciding how best to manage the controversy related to Russia’s interference in the 2016 US presidential election via its platform.

“It’s going to be a flash in the pan. The elected officials will be groaning. And in a few weeks, they’ll have moved on. Meanwhile, we’re printing money downstairs and all is well,” said Tucker Pounds, a member of the Facebook communications team.

The second informant signed his statement on October 13, a week after Francis Hogan’s resounding testimony before the US Congress.

The former Facebook computer scientist, described by the Democratic senator as a “hero,” reiterated that the leaders of the Californian group, Mark Zuckerberg at their helm, “fund their profits with our security.”

It was previously revealed to The Wall Street Journal Internal documents highlighting known abuses of social networks, such as the psychological problems of over-exposed teenage girls with seemingly “ideal” lives and the bodies of Instagram influencers.

See also  [EN DIRECT 28 FÉVRIER] All epidemic developments

according to Washington PostThe SEC statement to this new person ensures that Facebook executives regularly undermine efforts to combat disinformation, hate speech and other problematic content for fear of angering the policies of former US President Donald Trump and his allies and not risk losing users’ attention, which is essential to its huge profits.

In response to a question by AFP, Irene McBayk, a Facebook spokeswoman, said the article was “below the standards Washington Post, which was written over the past five years only after investigating the merits and finding multiple sources.”

The Californian company has been chaining controversies for years, from its moderation of content, especially during election time, to its economic strategy, which is seen as violating competition rules by many governments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *